Stuarts, Civil War, Republic and Restoration: KS3 History Study Pack

1. Introduction

In the seventeenth century, Britain experienced a major struggle over power. Kings claimed they had the right to rule, but Parliament increasingly argued that monarchs should not govern without advice, consent and limits.

This study pack focuses on the Stuart kings, the English Civil War, the execution of Charles I, the republic under Parliament and Oliver Cromwell, the Restoration of Charles II, and the later Glorious Revolution.

The big enquiry question is:

How far did power shift from the monarch to Parliament in seventeenth-century Britain?

By the end, you should be able to:

• explain why conflict grew between monarchs and Parliament
• sort the causes of the Civil War into political, religious, economic and personal causes
• compare Royalist and Parliamentarian viewpoints
• explain the significance of Charles I's execution
• describe the Commonwealth, Protectorate and Restoration
• understand why historians disagree about Oliver Cromwell
• use political sources carefully
• explain how the Bill of Rights limited royal power

This period did not create modern democracy. Most ordinary people still could not vote, women were excluded from Parliament, and politics was mainly controlled by wealthy men. However, the events of this period changed ideas about kingship, law, Parliament and government.

---

2. Key Definitions

Divine right
The belief that a monarch's authority came from God. Some Stuart kings argued that this meant they should not be challenged by Parliament.

Monarch
A king or queen.

Parliament
The national assembly that discussed laws and taxation. In this period, Parliament was made up mainly of wealthy men, landowners and important local figures.

Civil War
A war between groups within the same country. The English Civil War was fought between supporters of the king and supporters of Parliament.

Royalist
A supporter of King Charles I during the Civil War. Royalists were also called Cavaliers.

Parliamentarian
A supporter of Parliament during the Civil War. Parliamentarians were also called Roundheads.

Ship Money
A tax traditionally used in coastal areas to help defend the country by sea. Charles I extended it more widely during his Personal Rule, causing anger.

Personal Rule
The period from 1629 to 1640 when Charles I ruled without calling Parliament.

Archbishop Laud
William Laud was Archbishop of Canterbury. He supported religious changes that many Protestants feared were too close to Catholicism.

New Model Army
Parliament's reorganised army, created in 1645. It was more disciplined and effective than many earlier forces.

Republic
A country without a monarch. After Charles I was executed in 1649, England became a republic.

Commonwealth
The name used for the republic after the monarchy and House of Lords were abolished.

Protectorate
The period when Oliver Cromwell ruled as Lord Protector from 1653 to 1658.

Restoration
The return of the monarchy in 1660, when Charles II became king.

Glorious Revolution
The events of 1688-1689 when James II was removed and William III and Mary II became joint monarchs.

Bill of Rights
A 1689 law that limited the power of the monarch and strengthened Parliament.

Constitutional change
Change in the rules, customs and laws about how a country is governed.

---

3. Timeline / Chronology

Year	Event	Why It Matters
1603	James VI of Scotland becomes James I of England	The Stuart dynasty begins in England.
1605	Gunpowder Plot	Increased fear of Catholic plots against the Protestant state.
1625	Charles I becomes king	His reign brings growing conflict with Parliament.
1628	Petition of Right	Parliament tries to limit the king's use of taxes and imprisonment.
1629	Charles I begins Personal Rule	He rules without Parliament for eleven years.
1634-1639	Ship Money collected more widely	Many people see this as unfair taxation without Parliament.
1637	Prayer book imposed in Scotland	Religious tensions lead to rebellion in Scotland.
1640	Long Parliament meets	Charles needs money and must call Parliament.
1642	Civil War breaks out	Armed conflict begins between king and Parliament.
1644	Battle of Marston Moor	Parliament gains an important victory in the north.
1645	New Model Army wins at Naseby	Charles I's military position is badly weakened.
1649	Charles I is tried and executed	England becomes a republic.
1649-1653	Commonwealth	England is ruled without a king.
1653-1658	Cromwell rules as Lord Protector	The Protectorate mixes military power, Puritan reform and attempts at order.
1660	Restoration of Charles II	The monarchy returns.
1688	Glorious Revolution	James II is removed after conflict over religion and power.
1689	Bill of Rights	The monarch's power is limited by law.

---

4. Core Knowledge Sections

4.1 James I and Divine Right

James I became king of England in 1603 after the death of Elizabeth I. He was already James VI of Scotland, so he ruled both kingdoms. He believed strongly in the divine right of kings.

James argued that kings received their authority from God. This did not mean he thought kings could do anything they wanted without problems, but it did mean he expected obedience. He disliked being challenged by Parliament.

Parliament had important powers, especially over taxation. Kings often needed Parliament to grant money. This created tension:

• James believed monarchy was sacred and powerful.
• Parliament believed it had rights and privileges.
• MPs wanted to discuss grievances before granting money.
• The king wanted financial support without too much criticism.

James also faced religious tension. England was officially Protestant, but different groups wanted different kinds of Protestantism. Some Puritans wanted the Church of England to be more strictly Protestant. Catholics faced suspicion, especially after the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.

James avoided civil war, but his reign left unresolved problems:

• arguments over money
• arguments over royal authority
• arguments over religion
• distrust between Crown and Parliament

4.2 Charles I, Parliament, Money and Religion

Charles I became king in 1625. Like his father, he believed strongly in royal authority. He also had a more formal and distant style, which made him seem untrustworthy to some critics.

Charles needed money for wars and government. Parliament was reluctant to grant money without raising complaints. MPs criticised:

• forced loans
• imprisonment without trial
• billeting soldiers in people's homes
• taxation without proper consent
• the influence of royal favourites

In 1628, Parliament presented the Petition of Right. It argued that the king should not:

• collect taxes without Parliament's consent
• imprison people without cause
• force civilians to house soldiers
• use martial law in peacetime

Charles accepted the Petition, but many MPs believed he did not follow its spirit. In 1629, after angry scenes in Parliament, Charles dissolved it and began ruling without it.

4.3 Personal Rule and Ship Money

From 1629 to 1640, Charles ruled without Parliament. This is known as the Personal Rule or sometimes the "Eleven Years' Tyranny", though that phrase reflects the view of his opponents.

Charles still needed money. Without Parliament, he used older financial methods more actively. The most famous was Ship Money.

Ship Money had traditionally been collected from coastal towns in times of danger to help pay for naval defence. Charles extended it to inland counties and collected it in peacetime. Some people paid, but many objected.

Opponents argued:

• only Parliament should approve national taxation
• Ship Money was being used too widely
• the king was avoiding Parliament on purpose
• the tax threatened English liberties

Supporters argued:

• the king had to defend the country
• the navy was important
• older legal powers allowed the tax
• order depended on respecting royal authority

The case of John Hampden, who refused to pay Ship Money, became famous. The judges narrowly ruled in favour of the king, but the case increased political tension.

4.4 Archbishop Laud and Religious Tension

Religion was one of the most important causes of conflict. England was Protestant, but Protestants disagreed about worship.

Charles supported Archbishop William Laud. Laud wanted greater order, ceremony and beauty in church services. He encouraged changes such as:

• placing communion tables at the east end of churches
• using rails around the altar area
• insisting clergy follow official rules
• punishing some outspoken Puritan critics

Many Puritans feared these changes looked too Catholic. This mattered because anti-Catholic feeling was strong in England. Charles was also married to Henrietta Maria, a Catholic French princess, which increased suspicion among his opponents.

In Scotland, Charles and Laud tried to introduce a new prayer book in 1637. Many Scots resisted, believing their Presbyterian Church was under threat. This led to the Bishops' Wars. Charles needed money to fight, so he had to call Parliament in 1640.

4.5 Causes of the English Civil War

The Civil War was not caused by one argument. It developed from several connected causes.

Political causes

• James I and Charles I believed strongly in royal authority.
• Parliament wanted to defend its privileges.
• Charles ruled without Parliament from 1629 to 1640.
• MPs feared the king might destroy parliamentary rights.

Economic causes

• Charles needed money for government and war.
• Parliament disliked taxes raised without its consent.
• Ship Money angered many taxpayers.
• Financial pressure forced Charles to recall Parliament.

Religious causes

• Puritans feared Charles and Laud were moving the Church towards Catholic practices.
• Catholics were widely distrusted by many Protestants.
• Religious changes in Scotland led to rebellion.
• People feared that religion and politics were linked.

Personal causes

• Charles was seen by critics as stubborn and secretive.
• MPs distrusted the king's advisers.
• Charles believed Parliament was challenging his rightful authority.
• Failed compromises made both sides more suspicious.

Short-term causes

• Scottish rebellion forced Charles to call Parliament.
• Parliament passed laws limiting royal power.
• Charles tried to arrest five MPs in January 1642.
• Both sides began preparing for armed conflict.

4.6 Royalists and Parliamentarians

When war began, people chose sides for different reasons. It is too simple to say all wealthy people supported the king or all ordinary people supported Parliament. Local loyalties, religion, family connections and personal beliefs mattered.

Royalists often believed:

• the king was the rightful ruler
• rebellion against the king was dangerous
• social order depended on loyalty
• Parliament had gone too far

Parliamentarians often believed:

• the king had abused his power
• Parliament must protect English liberties
• taxation should need consent
• religion needed protection from Catholic influence

Some people tried to avoid taking sides. Others changed sides. Many ordinary people suffered from taxation, soldiers, disruption and fear, even if they had little say in national politics.

4.7 Key Events of the Civil War

The English Civil War began in 1642 when Charles I raised his royal standard at Nottingham. The war involved England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland in connected conflicts often called the Wars of the Three Kingdoms.

Important events included:

• 1642: Edgehill - an early battle with no clear winner.
• 1644: Marston Moor - Parliament and its Scottish allies won a major victory in the north.
• 1645: Naseby - the New Model Army defeated the Royalists decisively.
• 1646: Charles I surrendered - the first phase of the war ended.
• 1648: Second Civil War - Charles's negotiations and renewed conflict hardened attitudes against him.
• 1649: Trial and execution - Charles was executed after being found guilty by a special court.

4.8 The New Model Army

Parliament created the New Model Army in 1645. It was important because it was organised more professionally than many earlier forces.

Features included:

• promotion partly based on ability rather than only social status
• stronger discipline
• clearer organisation
• religious motivation among many soldiers
• national rather than mainly local command

The New Model Army helped Parliament win the war. It also became politically important. Soldiers debated ideas about liberty, religion and the future of government. Some wanted greater political reform than Parliament was willing to allow.

4.9 Trial and Execution of Charles I

After the Second Civil War, many army leaders believed Charles could not be trusted. They thought he had caused renewed bloodshed by negotiating with different groups while claiming to seek peace.

In January 1649, Charles was put on trial. This was extraordinary because kings were usually considered above ordinary courts. The charge accused him of being a "tyrant, traitor, murderer and public enemy", but for KS3 you should understand the key issue: Parliamentarian leaders claimed a king could be held accountable for harming his people.

Charles refused to recognise the court's authority. He argued that no court had the right to try a lawful king. He was found guilty and executed on 30 January 1649.

This was highly significant because:

• it challenged divine right monarchy
• it showed a king could be judged by political opponents
• it ended the monarchy temporarily
• it shocked many people in Britain and Europe
• it did not create full democracy
• it left the problem of how to govern without a king

4.10 Commonwealth and Protectorate

After Charles I's execution, England became a republic. The monarchy and House of Lords were abolished. The new government was called the Commonwealth.

However, the Commonwealth faced major problems:

• many people still supported monarchy
• Parliament was divided
• the army was powerful
• wars continued in Ireland and Scotland
• there were arguments about religious freedom
• there was no agreed constitution

In 1653, Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector. This began the Protectorate. Cromwell was not a king, but he held great power. He worked with councils and parliaments, but he also relied on the army.

Cromwell's rule is debated. Some people at the time and later saw him as a defender of Protestant liberty and order. Others saw him as a military ruler who limited freedom and used force.

4.11 Cromwell: Liberty and Order

Cromwell believed he was serving God and protecting the nation. He supported some religious toleration for Protestant groups, though not equal rights for everyone. Catholics faced hostility. Jewish people were allowed to return to England in the 1650s after being officially expelled in the medieval period.

At the same time, Cromwell's government could be strict. Some forms of entertainment were restricted in some areas, and military rule under major-generals was unpopular. His campaigns in Ireland, especially Drogheda and Wexford in 1649, remain deeply controversial because of the violence and long-term impact on Irish communities.

A balanced KS3 judgement should avoid treating Cromwell as only a hero or only a villain. He was:

• a successful military leader
• a committed Puritan
• a ruler who tried to create stability
• a person who used military power
• a figure linked to harsh conquest in Ireland
• a leader whose actions are interpreted differently

4.12 Restoration of Charles II

Oliver Cromwell died in 1658. His son Richard Cromwell became Lord Protector but lacked support from the army and political leaders. The republic became unstable.

Many people wanted:

• stable government
• an end to military rule
• settlement after years of conflict
• the return of traditional monarchy, but with lessons learned

In 1660, Charles II, the son of Charles I, was invited back. This was the Restoration. The monarchy, House of Lords and Church of England were restored.

The Restoration did not mean everything returned exactly to how it had been before 1642. Kings had to be more careful with Parliament. Memories of civil war shaped politics. People were aware that conflict could return if monarchs and Parliament failed to cooperate.

4.13 Glorious Revolution and Bill of Rights

Charles II was followed by his brother James II in 1685. James was Catholic, which worried many Protestants. He also tried to increase royal power and promote religious policies that many political leaders opposed.

In 1688, leading figures invited William of Orange, a Protestant Dutch ruler married to James's Protestant daughter Mary, to intervene. James II fled. William III and Mary II became joint monarchs.

This became known as the Glorious Revolution. The name is debated because it can make the event sound simple and bloodless, even though there was violence connected with it in Scotland and Ireland.

In 1689, the Bill of Rights limited royal power. It said, among other things, that:

• the monarch could not suspend laws without Parliament
• taxation needed parliamentary consent
• Parliament should meet regularly
• elections to Parliament should be free
• cruel and unusual punishments should not be used

At a simple bridging level, the Bill of Rights showed that monarchy survived, but it was now more clearly limited by law and Parliament.

---

5. People, Places and Events

Key People

Person	Role	Why They Matter
James I	King of England and Scotland	Believed in divine right and clashed with Parliament.
Charles I	King from 1625 to 1649	His conflicts with Parliament led to civil war and execution.
Henrietta Maria	Charles I's Catholic queen	Her religion increased Protestant fears at court.
William Laud	Archbishop of Canterbury	His religious reforms angered many Puritans.
John Hampden	Opponent of Ship Money	Became a symbol of resistance to royal taxation.
John Pym	Leading Parliamentarian critic	Helped organise opposition to Charles I.
Prince Rupert	Royalist commander	Important cavalry leader for the king.
Oliver Cromwell	Parliamentarian commander and Lord Protector	Helped win the war and later ruled the Protectorate.
Thomas Fairfax	Commander of the New Model Army	Led Parliament's army at Naseby.
Charles II	Restored king in 1660	His return ended the republic.
James II	King removed in 1688	His rule led to the Glorious Revolution.
William III and Mary II	Joint monarchs from 1689	Accepted the Bill of Rights.

Key Places

Place	Importance
Westminster	Centre of Parliament and national politics.
Nottingham	Charles I raised his standard there in 1642.
Edgehill	Site of an early battle in 1642.
Marston Moor	Major Parliamentarian victory in 1644.
Naseby	Decisive Parliamentarian victory in 1645.
Whitehall	Charles I was executed outside the Banqueting House in 1649.
Scotland	Religious conflict there forced Charles to call Parliament.
Ireland	Site of major conflict and Cromwell's controversial campaign.

Key Events

Event	Date	Significance
Petition of Right	1628	Parliament tried to limit royal power.
Personal Rule begins	1629	Charles ruled without Parliament.
Scottish Prayer Book crisis	1637	Religious conflict became a political crisis.
Long Parliament	1640	Parliament challenged royal policies.
Attempted arrest of Five MPs	1642	Trust between king and Parliament collapsed further.
Civil War begins	1642	Political conflict became armed conflict.
New Model Army formed	1645	Parliament gained a more effective army.
Charles I executed	1649	Monarchy was abolished temporarily.
Cromwell becomes Lord Protector	1653	The republic became a Protectorate.
Restoration	1660	Monarchy returned under Charles II.
Bill of Rights	1689	Royal power was limited by law.

---

6. Sources and Evidence

Historians use sources carefully. A source does not simply "tell the truth" or "lie". It gives evidence from a particular time, person and purpose.

When using a source, ask:

• Who made it?
• When was it made?
• Why was it made?
• Who was the audience?
• What does it say or show?
• What does it leave out?
• How does it fit the wider context?

Source A: Adapted Parliamentary Grievance About Ship Money

This is an invented but historically plausible extract based on common Parliamentarian complaints.

Many subjects have been charged with payments not granted by Parliament. Ship Money, once used for coastal defence in danger, has been demanded from inland counties and in time of peace. If such payments continue, the property of subjects will depend on the king's will rather than the law.

Questions

1. What complaint does Source A make about Ship Money?
2. What does the source suggest about Parliamentarian ideas of law and property?
3. Use one phrase from the source to support your answer.
4. How useful is this source for studying opposition to Charles I?
5. What limitation does the source have?

How to think about it

• Content: it criticises taxation without Parliament.
• Context: Ship Money was a major grievance during the Personal Rule.
• Purpose: it aims to persuade people that royal taxation is dangerous.
• Limitation: it gives the opponents' view, not the king's defence.

Source B: Visual Source Description

Imagine a printed image from the 1640s showing a king on one side and Parliament on the other. The king holds a crown and sword. Parliament holds a book labelled "law" and a paper labelled "liberties". Ordinary people stand between them looking worried.

Questions

1. What does the image show?
2. What might the crown and sword represent?
3. What might the book labelled "law" represent?
4. What does the image suggest about ordinary people's position?
5. Why might a printed image be useful for understanding political propaganda?

Source C: Charles I Trial Timeline

Date	Event
6 December 1648	Pride's Purge removes many MPs who oppose the army's plans.
1 January 1649	A special High Court of Justice is established.
20 January 1649	Charles I's trial begins.
27 January 1649	Charles is found guilty.
30 January 1649	Charles I is executed.

Questions

1. How many days passed between the start of the trial and the execution?
2. What does Pride's Purge suggest about the role of the army?
3. Why was the creation of a special court important?
4. How useful is a timeline for understanding the trial?
5. What can a timeline not explain by itself?

Source D: Two Interpretations of Cromwell

These are invented interpretation extracts, not real quotations.

Interpretation 1: Cromwell as Defender of Order

Cromwell was a leader who helped stop royal absolutism and tried to govern a divided country after years of war. He believed order and Protestant religion were necessary for peace.

Interpretation 2: Cromwell as Military Ruler

Cromwell claimed to protect liberty, but his power depended on the army. His government restricted opponents and used force in Ireland and Britain.

Questions

1. What is the main difference between the two interpretations?
2. Which interpretation gives Cromwell more credit?
3. Which interpretation is more critical?
4. Why might historians disagree about Cromwell?
5. What extra evidence would help you judge these interpretations?

Source E: Monarchy-Parliament Power Scale

Use this scale to think about change over time.

More monarch power                                      More Parliament power
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
1603 James I      1629 Personal Rule      1649 Republic      1689 Bill of Rights

Questions

1. Where would you place Charles I during the Personal Rule? Explain your choice.
2. Where would you place the Commonwealth? Explain your choice.
3. Where would you place the Restoration? Explain your choice.
4. Where would you place the Bill of Rights? Explain your choice.
5. Does the scale show all details of political power? Why or why not?

---

7. Interpretations

An interpretation is an explanation or view of the past. Historians can use the same evidence but reach different judgements because they ask different questions, value different evidence, or focus on different groups.

Interpretation Issue 1: Was Charles I Mainly to Blame?

Some historians emphasise Charles I's mistakes:

• he ruled without Parliament
• he raised taxes without consent
• he supported unpopular religious changes
• he tried to arrest five MPs
• he negotiated in ways that increased distrust

Other historians emphasise wider problems:

• kings and Parliament had argued before
• early modern government needed money but had limited systems for raising it
• religious fear was widespread
• local and national tensions were complicated
• both sides made choices that worsened conflict

Balanced judgement: Charles I was very important, but the Civil War was caused by a combination of long-term tensions and short-term crises.

Interpretation Issue 2: Was Cromwell a Hero or Villain?

This is too simple. Cromwell's reputation depends on what evidence is emphasised.

Positive interpretations may stress:

• military skill
• opposition to Charles I
• support for some Protestant religious freedom
• attempts to create stable government

Critical interpretations may stress:

• military rule
• limits on political freedom
• harsh treatment of opponents
• violence in Ireland
• failure to create a lasting republic

Balanced judgement: Cromwell was a significant and complex figure. He helped defeat royal power, but he did not create modern democracy and often relied on force.

Interpretation Issue 3: Did the Civil War Create Democracy?

The execution of Charles I was revolutionary, but England did not become a democracy in the modern sense.

Reasons it was not modern democracy:

• most men could not vote
• women could not vote
• political power stayed with elites
• the army had major influence
• Parliament did not represent everyone equally

Reasons it still mattered:

• monarchy was abolished for a time
• royal authority was challenged
• Parliament's role became more important
• later rulers had to consider the risks of ignoring Parliament
• the Bill of Rights limited monarchy more clearly

---

8. Tables

8.1 Causes of the Civil War

Type of Cause	Example	How It Increased Tension
Political	Divine right and parliamentary privilege	King and MPs disagreed over who had authority.
Economic	Ship Money	Many believed the king was taxing without consent.
Religious	Laud's reforms	Puritans feared Catholic-style worship.
Personal	Charles's distrust of MPs	Failed trust made compromise harder.
Short-term	Attempted arrest of five MPs	Many saw this as an attack on Parliament.
Long-term	Weak royal finances	Monarchs often needed Parliament for money.

8.2 Royalists vs Parliamentarians

Issue	Royalist View	Parliamentarian View
Authority	The king was the lawful ruler.	Parliament must defend law and liberty.
Taxation	The king needed money to govern and defend the realm.	Major taxation needed Parliament's consent.
Religion	The king should govern the Church in order.	Laud's reforms threatened Protestant religion.
Rebellion	Taking arms against the king was dangerous.	The king had broken trust and threatened rights.
Social order	Loyalty preserved peace.	Limits on power protected subjects.

8.3 What Changed and What Continued?

Period	What Changed	What Continued
James I	Stuart ideas of divine right became central.	Parliament still controlled many taxes.
Personal Rule	Charles ruled without Parliament.	The monarchy still needed money and obedience.
Civil War	Politics became armed conflict.	Most ordinary people had little political power.
Commonwealth	Monarchy was abolished.	Government remained controlled by elites and army leaders.
Protectorate	Cromwell ruled as Lord Protector.	Strong central authority continued.
Restoration	Monarchy returned.	Kings still had to work with Parliament.
Bill of Rights	Royal power was more clearly limited.	Voting remained restricted.

8.4 Significance of Charles I's Execution

Criteria	Explanation
Remarkable	It was unusual and shocking to execute a king.
Remembered	It became a major event in British history.
Resulted in change	Monarchy was abolished and a republic created.
Revealing	It showed deep disagreement about authority and law.
Resonant	It influenced later debates about monarchy and Parliament.

---

9. Text / ASCII Diagrams and Timelines

9.1 Cause Web for the Civil War

                         ENGLISH CIVIL WAR
                                |
        -------------------------------------------------
        |                  |                 |           |
    Political          Religious         Economic    Personal
        |                  |                 |           |
 Divine right       Laud's reforms      Ship Money  Distrust of Charles
 Personal Rule      Puritan fears       War costs   Failed compromise
 Five MPs crisis    Scottish crisis     Forced loans Royal favourites

9.2 Cause-Consequence Chain

Charles believes strongly in royal authority
                |
Arguments with Parliament over money and rights
                |
Personal Rule without Parliament, 1629-1640
                |
Ship Money and religious reforms increase distrust
                |
Scottish rebellion forces Charles to recall Parliament
                |
Parliament challenges the king's power
                |
Trust collapses after the Five MPs crisis
                |
Civil War breaks out in 1642

9.3 Charles I Trial Sequence

Second Civil War
      |
Army leaders decide Charles cannot be trusted
      |
Pride's Purge removes many MPs
      |
Special court tries Charles I
      |
Charles rejects the court's authority
      |
Charles found guilty
      |
Execution, 30 January 1649
      |
Monarchy abolished

9.4 Monarchy-Parliament Power Scale

More monarch power                                      More Parliament power
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
James I       Charles I Personal Rule       Commonwealth       Bill of Rights
1603          1629-1640                     1649              1689

Key idea:
Power did not move in a straight line. The Restoration brought monarchy back,
but later laws made it harder for monarchs to rule without Parliament.

9.5 Simple Argument Scale

Question: How significant was Charles I's execution?

Less significant                                      More significant
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
It did not create democracy       It ended monarchy temporarily
Most people still lacked votes    It challenged divine right
Monarchy returned in 1660         It changed political expectations

---

10. Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: "The Civil War was caused by one argument."

Correction: The Civil War had many causes. Money, religion, political authority, personal distrust and short-term crises all mattered.

Mistake 2: "Parliament represented all ordinary people."

Correction: Parliament was not democratic in the modern sense. Most ordinary people could not vote. MPs were usually wealthy men.

Mistake 3: "Cromwell was only a hero" or "Cromwell was only a villain."

Correction: Cromwell was complex. He defended some liberties but used military power and is strongly criticised for his actions in Ireland.

Mistake 4: "Restoration means Reformation."

Correction: The Restoration was the return of the monarchy in 1660. The Reformation was the earlier religious change in the sixteenth century.

Mistake 5: "Charles I's execution instantly created democracy."

Correction: England became a republic, but political power remained limited. It was not modern democracy.

Mistake 6: "Royalists were all rich and Parliamentarians were all poor."

Correction: Both sides included different social groups. Local loyalties, religion and family ties mattered.

Mistake 7: "The Glorious Revolution solved every political problem."

Correction: It limited monarchy and strengthened Parliament, but voting was still restricted and conflict continued in Scotland and Ireland.

Mistake 8: "A source is useless if it is biased."

Correction: A biased source can still be useful. It may show beliefs, fears, arguments and propaganda. You must explain its purpose and limitations.

---

11. Exam Tips

Command Words

Describe
Say what happened or what something was like. Use accurate facts.

Explain
Give reasons. Use because, therefore, this meant that, as a result.

Compare
Show similarities and differences.

How far
Make a judgement. Explain both sides before deciding.

How useful
Use content and provenance. Explain what the source helps with and what it cannot show.

How significant
Judge importance using criteria such as consequences, change, and how long the impact lasted.

Writing Strong Paragraphs

Use this structure:

Point: One reason the Civil War broke out was religion.
Evidence: Charles I supported Archbishop Laud's reforms.
Explain: Many Puritans feared these changes looked too Catholic.
Link: This increased distrust between Parliament and the king.

Source Questions

For source usefulness, include:

• what the source says or shows
• what you can infer
• who made it and why
• the wider historical context
• one limitation

Longer Answers

For 6-8 mark answers:

• write two or three clear paragraphs
• include precise examples
• explain causes and consequences
• consider more than one side
• finish with a judgement if the question asks for one

---

12. Practice Questions

12.1 Quick Recall Questions

1. Who became king of England in 1603?
2. What does divine right mean?
3. Who became king in 1625?
4. What was the Petition of Right?
5. What was the Personal Rule?
6. What was Ship Money?
7. Who was Archbishop Laud?
8. Why did many Puritans dislike Laud's reforms?
9. In what year did the Civil War begin?
10. What were supporters of the king called?
11. What were supporters of Parliament called?
12. What was the New Model Army?
13. Which battle in 1645 was a major Parliamentarian victory?
14. When was Charles I executed?
15. What is a republic?
16. What was the Commonwealth?
17. Who became Lord Protector in 1653?
18. What was the Protectorate?
19. What was the Restoration?
20. Who returned as king in 1660?
21. Who was removed in the Glorious Revolution?
22. What was the Bill of Rights?
23. Did the Civil War create modern democracy?
24. Give one reason historians disagree about Cromwell.

12.2 Multiple Choice Questions

1. What dynasty began ruling England in 1603?
   A. Tudor
   B. Stuart
   C. Hanoverian
   D. Norman

2. Divine right was the belief that monarchs got their authority from:
   A. Parliament
   B. the army
   C. God
   D. local councils

3. Charles I became king in:
   A. 1603
   B. 1625
   C. 1649
   D. 1689

4. The Petition of Right was presented in:
   A. 1628
   B. 1637
   C. 1645
   D. 1660

5. The Personal Rule lasted from:
   A. 1603-1625
   B. 1629-1640
   C. 1642-1649
   D. 1653-1658

6. Ship Money caused anger because:
   A. it ended Parliament
   B. it was collected widely without Parliament's consent
   C. it made Charles II king
   D. it abolished the navy

7. William Laud was:
   A. a Royalist cavalry leader
   B. Archbishop of Canterbury
   C. Lord Protector
   D. a Scottish king

8. Many Puritans feared Laud's reforms were too close to:
   A. Catholicism
   B. Buddhism
   C. Judaism
   D. atheism

9. The Civil War began in:
   A. 1628
   B. 1642
   C. 1653
   D. 1688

10. Royalists supported:
    A. Charles I
    B. the French king
    C. William Laud only
    D. the Dutch republic

11. Parliamentarians supported:
    A. Parliament against the king
    B. James II against William
    C. the Spanish monarchy
    D. no laws at all

12. The New Model Army was created in:
    A. 1605
    B. 1629
    C. 1645
    D. 1689

13. The Battle of Naseby was important because:
    A. it restored Charles II
    B. it was a decisive Parliamentarian victory
    C. it began the Gunpowder Plot
    D. it passed the Bill of Rights

14. Charles I was executed in:
    A. 1642
    B. 1645
    C. 1649
    D. 1660

15. A republic is a country:
    A. ruled without a monarch
    B. ruled only by bishops
    C. with no laws
    D. controlled by another empire

16. The Commonwealth was:
    A. the name of the republic after 1649
    B. a Royalist army
    C. a tax on ships
    D. a prayer book

17. Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector in:
    A. 1642
    B. 1649
    C. 1653
    D. 1688

18. The Restoration happened in:
    A. 1603
    B. 1628
    C. 1660
    D. 1689

19. The Restoration restored:
    A. the monarchy
    B. the Roman Empire
    C. the Gunpowder Plot
    D. Ship Money

20. Charles II was the son of:
    A. James II
    B. Charles I
    C. Oliver Cromwell
    D. William III

21. James II was removed during the:
    A. Reformation
    B. Glorious Revolution
    C. Norman Conquest
    D. Industrial Revolution

22. The Bill of Rights was passed in:
    A. 1605
    B. 1649
    C. 1660
    D. 1689

23. The Bill of Rights helped to:
    A. increase unlimited royal power
    B. limit the monarch's power
    C. abolish Parliament permanently
    D. make Charles I king again

24. Which of these is a religious cause of the Civil War?
    A. Ship Money
    B. Laud's reforms
    C. the Battle of Naseby
    D. the Restoration

25. Which of these is an economic cause of the Civil War?
    A. Ship Money
    B. Marston Moor
    C. the Bill of Rights
    D. Charles II's return

26. Which event showed Charles I's conflict with Parliament had become very serious in 1642?
    A. the attempted arrest of five MPs
    B. the return of Charles II
    C. the death of Cromwell
    D. the passing of the Bill of Rights

27. Why is the term "Glorious Revolution" debated?
    A. It happened before the Stuarts.
    B. It was not connected to monarchy.
    C. It can hide violence and complexity.
    D. It restored Charles I.

28. Which statement is most accurate?
    A. Parliament represented everyone equally.
    B. The Civil War had only one cause.
    C. Cromwell is interpreted in different ways.
    D. The Restoration was the same as the Reformation.

29. What did Pride's Purge show?
    A. the army had political power
    B. the navy controlled Parliament
    C. Charles II had returned
    D. James I had become king

30. Which question best helps evaluate a source?
    A. Is it old enough to ignore?
    B. Who made it, why, and what does it show?
    C. Does it agree with me?
    D. Is it written in modern English?

31. Which was a major consequence of Charles I's execution?
    A. monarchy was abolished temporarily
    B. all adults got the vote
    C. Parliament disappeared forever
    D. James I returned

32. Which phrase best describes power after 1689?
    A. unlimited monarchy
    B. monarchy more clearly limited by Parliament and law
    C. complete modern democracy
    D. rule by Charles I's court

12.3 Cause Classification Questions

Sort each factor into political, religious, economic, personal or short-term cause.

1. Ship Money
2. Laud's reforms
3. Charles I's belief in divine right
4. the attempted arrest of five MPs
5. Charles's distrust of Parliament
6. Scottish rebellion over the prayer book
7. Parliament's defence of its privileges
8. Charles's need for war money

12.4 Source Questions

Use Source A from Section 6.

1. Identify one complaint made about Ship Money.
2. What can you infer about Parliamentarian attitudes to taxation?
3. Explain one way the source is useful.
4. Explain one limitation of the source.
5. How useful is Source A for an enquiry into why Charles I became unpopular?

Use Source D from Section 6.

6. Which interpretation is more positive about Cromwell?
7. Which interpretation is more critical?
8. Give one reason the interpretations differ.
9. What evidence could support Interpretation 1?
10. What evidence could support Interpretation 2?

12.5 Short Answer Questions

1. Describe one belief linked to divine right.
2. Explain why Ship Money caused anger.
3. Describe one religious tension under Charles I.
4. Explain why the Scottish crisis was important.
5. Describe one difference between Royalists and Parliamentarians.
6. Explain why the New Model Army was significant.
7. Describe what happened to Charles I in 1649.
8. Explain why Charles I's execution was significant.
9. Describe one problem faced by the Commonwealth.
10. Explain why the monarchy was restored in 1660.
11. Describe one way the Bill of Rights limited royal power.
12. Explain why the Civil War did not create modern democracy.

12.6 Longer Written Questions

1. Explain why Civil War broke out in 1642.
2. Compare Royalist and Parliamentarian viewpoints.
3. How significant was the execution of Charles I?
4. How far did power shift from monarch to Parliament between 1603 and 1689?
5. How useful is a parliamentary grievance source for studying opposition to Charles I?
6. Explain why historians have different interpretations of Oliver Cromwell.

---

13. Answer Key

13.1 Quick Recall Answers

1. James I.
2. The belief that a monarch's authority came from God.
3. Charles I.
4. A document in which Parliament tried to limit royal actions such as taxation without consent and imprisonment without cause.
5. Charles I's rule without Parliament from 1629 to 1640.
6. A tax traditionally linked to naval defence, extended widely by Charles I.
7. Archbishop of Canterbury.
8. They feared the reforms looked too Catholic.
10. Royalists.
11. Parliamentarians.
12. Parliament's reorganised and disciplined army created in 1645.
13. Naseby.
14. 30 January 1649.
15. A country without a monarch.
16. The republic after the monarchy was abolished.
17. Oliver Cromwell.
18. Cromwell's period of rule as Lord Protector.
19. The return of the monarchy in 1660.
20. Charles II.
21. James II.
22. A 1689 law limiting royal power and strengthening Parliament.
23. No.
24. Possible answers: he defended Parliament, ruled with the army, supported some Protestant toleration, used force in Ireland, restricted some freedoms.

13.2 Multiple Choice Answers

1. B
2. C
3. B
4. A
5. B
6. B
7. B
8. A
9. B
10. A
11. A
12. C
13. B
14. C
15. A
16. A
17. C
18. C
19. A
20. B
21. B
22. D
23. B
24. B
25. A
26. A
27. C
28. C
29. A
30. B
31. A
32. B

13.3 Cause Classification Answers

1. Ship Money - economic.
2. Laud's reforms - religious.
3. Divine right - political.
4. Attempted arrest of five MPs - short-term and political.
5. Charles's distrust - personal.
6. Scottish rebellion - religious and short-term.
7. Parliament's privileges - political.
8. War money - economic.

13.4 Source Answer Hints

Source A:

1. It complains that Ship Money was demanded without Parliament and from inland counties.
2. Parliamentarians believed taxation should be controlled by law and Parliament.
3. It is useful because it shows why Ship Money was seen as a threat to property and liberty.
4. It is limited because it gives only the opponents' view.
5. It is useful for showing economic and political grievances, but it does not show Charles's defence or all causes of unpopularity.

Source D:

6. Interpretation 1.
7. Interpretation 2.
8. They focus on different evidence and values, such as order, liberty, military rule and violence.
9. His role in defeating Charles I and supporting some Protestant religious freedom.
10. His reliance on the army and the violence of campaigns in Ireland.

---

14. Model Answers

Model Answer 1: Explain Why Civil War Broke Out in 1642

Civil War broke out because of long-term political disagreements between Charles I and Parliament. Charles believed strongly in divine right and expected obedience. Parliament believed it had important rights, especially over taxation. When Charles ruled without Parliament from 1629 to 1640, many MPs feared he wanted to weaken Parliament permanently.

Money also caused serious tension. Charles needed funds for government and war, but Parliament did not trust him. During the Personal Rule he collected Ship Money more widely, including from inland counties and in peacetime. Many opponents argued that this was taxation without proper consent.

Religion made the conflict worse. Charles supported Archbishop Laud's reforms, which many Puritans thought looked too Catholic. The attempt to impose a new prayer book in Scotland caused rebellion, forcing Charles to call Parliament. This gave MPs the chance to attack his policies.

The short-term crisis came in 1641-1642. Parliament challenged royal power, and Charles tried to arrest five MPs. This made compromise much harder because many people believed the king had attacked Parliament's privileges. Therefore, Civil War broke out because political, economic, religious and personal tensions combined with short-term events.

Model Answer 2: Compare Royalist and Parliamentarian Viewpoints

Royalists and Parliamentarians disagreed about where political authority should lie. Royalists believed Charles I was the lawful king and that resisting him could destroy order. They thought loyalty to the monarch helped protect peace and stability.

Parliamentarians believed Parliament had to defend law, liberty and Protestant religion. They argued that Charles had abused his power by ruling without Parliament and raising money such as Ship Money without proper consent. Many also feared that Laud's religious reforms threatened Protestantism.

There were some similarities. Both sides claimed they were defending the true interests of the kingdom. Both said they wanted order, law and religion protected. The difference was that Royalists trusted the king to protect these things, while Parliamentarians increasingly believed the king was the threat.

Model Answer 3: How Significant Was the Execution of Charles I?

The execution of Charles I was highly significant because it challenged the idea of divine right monarchy. Kings were usually seen as above ordinary courts, but Charles was put on trial and executed. This showed that some Parliamentarian and army leaders believed a king could be held responsible for harming his people.

It was also significant because it caused major constitutional change. The monarchy and House of Lords were abolished, and England became a republic called the Commonwealth. This was a dramatic break from the normal pattern of government.

However, its significance should not be exaggerated. It did not create modern democracy. Most people still could not vote, women had no parliamentary vote, and the army became very powerful. The monarchy also returned in 1660.

Overall, Charles I's execution was very significant because it changed ideas about kingship and authority, even though many limits on political participation remained.

Model Answer 4: How Far Did Power Shift From Monarch to Parliament Between 1603 and 1689?

Power shifted considerably from monarch to Parliament between 1603 and 1689, but not in a simple straight line. In 1603, James I believed strongly in divine right. Charles I later tried to rule without Parliament during the Personal Rule, which suggested that Stuart monarchs still wanted strong personal authority.

The Civil War and execution of Charles I marked a major challenge to monarchy. After 1649, England became a republic and the monarchy was abolished. This seemed like a huge shift away from royal power. However, Parliament did not become fully democratic, and the army held great influence during the Commonwealth and Protectorate.

The Restoration in 1660 brought monarchy back, so power moved back towards the Crown in some ways. Yet the Restoration did not erase the memory of civil war. Monarchs had to be more careful, and Parliament remained important for taxation and law.

The clearest shift came with the Glorious Revolution and Bill of Rights in 1689. The Bill of Rights limited the monarch's ability to suspend laws, raise taxation without Parliament, and ignore parliamentary government. Overall, power shifted significantly towards Parliament by 1689, but Britain was still not a modern democracy.

Model Answer 5: How Useful Is Source A for Studying Opposition to Charles I?

Source A is useful because it shows a key reason why some people opposed Charles I. It complains that Ship Money was demanded from inland counties and in peacetime, even though it had once been linked to coastal defence. This helps explain why opponents saw the tax as unfair.

The source is also useful because it reveals political ideas. The phrase about property depending on "the king's will rather than the law" suggests that critics feared Charles was threatening legal rights and parliamentary consent.

However, the source has limitations. It only gives the view of Charles's opponents. It does not explain the king's argument that he needed money for defence, and it does not cover all causes of opposition, such as religion. Overall, it is useful for understanding economic and political grievances, but it should be used with other evidence.

Model Answer 6: Explain Why Historians Have Different Interpretations of Oliver Cromwell

Historians have different interpretations of Oliver Cromwell because his actions can be judged in different ways. Some focus on his role in defeating Charles I and limiting royal power. From this view, Cromwell helped defend Parliament and tried to create a godly and orderly government after years of war.

Other historians focus on Cromwell's use of military power. He ruled as Lord Protector with strong support from the army, and his government restricted some opponents. His campaign in Ireland is also strongly criticised because of its violence and long-term impact.

Historians may also ask different questions. A historian studying Protestant liberty might judge Cromwell differently from a historian studying Ireland or military rule. Therefore, interpretations differ because Cromwell was a complex figure whose actions had different consequences for different people.

---

15. Final Revision Checklist

• I know the key dates: 1603, 1625, 1629, 1640, 1642, 1645, 1649, 1653, 1660, 1688 and 1689.
• I can define divine right, Parliament, Civil War, Royalist, Parliamentarian, Ship Money, New Model Army, republic, Commonwealth, Protectorate, Restoration and Bill of Rights.
• I can explain why James I and Charles I clashed with Parliament.
• I can explain why Ship Money caused anger.
• I can explain why Laud's religious reforms increased tension.
• I can sort the causes of the Civil War into political, religious, economic, personal, short-term and long-term causes.
• I can compare Royalist and Parliamentarian viewpoints.
• I can describe the importance of the New Model Army.
• I can explain why Charles I was tried and executed.
• I can judge the significance of Charles I's execution.
• I can describe the Commonwealth and Protectorate.
• I can explain why Cromwell is interpreted in different ways.
• I can explain why monarchy was restored in 1660.
• I can explain how the Bill of Rights limited royal power.
• I understand that the Civil War did not create modern democracy.
• I can use source content and provenance to judge usefulness.
• I can explain interpretations using evidence.
• I can answer exam questions using clear points, precise evidence and explanation.